Showing posts with label Asia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Asia. Show all posts

Monday, August 26, 2024

Raising Mixed Race (a book for parents of mixed-race Asian kids)

Book cover for "Raising Mixed Race."

I read the book Raising Mixed Race: Multiracial Asian Children in a Post-Racial World [affiliate link], by Sharon H. Chang. I read this because my 2 kids are mixed-race Asian kids (white/Chinese). I really liked this book. It had a lot of deep stuff to say. I recommend this to parents of mixed-race Asian kids.

This post will cover some of my thoughts about the book:

---

Language

The book spends a lot of time in the beginning talking about the language used to discuss race. The language we commonly use has origins in racist ideologies throughout history- for example, in the 1700s, Europeans invented the "five-race construct" (ie, the five races are Caucasian, Mongolian, Malayan, Ethiopian, American). Even now, you sometimes see the term "Mongolian" used to refer to something related to east Asians. That's kinda racist.

The example given in the book is a nurse discussing Chang's son's "Mongolian spots." A Mongolian spot is a dark birthmark, kind of looks like a bruise, that some east Asian children have. The nurse, aware that the name sounded kinda racist, said, "I don't know why they call it that, they just do." Chang was unhappy about this; in the book she says this nurse was perpetuating this racism by using the term "Mongolian spots."

I don't really know what to think about this- my first reaction is that it seems fine to me to use the term "Mongolian spots" but to say it with air quotes or something that makes it obvious you're aware it sounds kinda racist. The book seems to be saying that even using it at all is racist and bad. What's the alternative, though? Does she want this nurse to start a movement to call it something different, right then and there? (A quick google tells me that "Mongolian spots" do have a non-racist name: slate gray nevus. Okay, so, now that we know, we should use that term instead.) My second reaction was, I'm white so maybe I shouldn't tell people of color "oh this thing you think is racist, actually it's not racist."

A lot of this book was about how it's problematic for people to say certain things about mixed-race Asian kids. And I definitely agree that the language we use for race has a really bad history, and it's important to learn about that history, and in an ideal world we wouldn't use that language, but I'm not sure what to do in the world we actually have. It doesn't seem helpful to me to create a really long list of things you're not allowed to say when talking about race (which is sort of what I felt the book was doing, in some places).

For example, the book says you shouldn't talk about what specific fraction people are of each race (ie, my kids are half Chinese and half white). Instead, the book always uses the term "mixed race" or lists the specific ethnic groups (for example, "Chinese/white"). Yes, this makes sense to me, because historically there have been government policies that quantified what fraction your ancestry would need to be to "count" as a certain race (like the "one-drop rule"), and those policies have always been harmful. And even now, if a mixed-race person ever meets someone who really wants to know the specific fractions of their ancestry (ie, it's really important to this random stranger to find out that you're 1/2 white, 1/4 Chinese, and 1/4 Vietnamese), that can really only come from racist assumptions. This person is trying to figure out what stereotypes to apply to you, and that's why they want to know the numbers. Or they're trying to say that you're not "really" Chinese (it could be other Chinese people telling a mixed-race Chinese person that).

So yeah, I agree that it's problematic to talk about mixed-race people in terms of specific fractions. And it's problematic to discuss which of their physical features look like which race. And it's problematic to say that one sibling looks "more white" than the other sibling. Etc. I feel like this book spends a lot of time telling us things we shouldn't say.

Is that useful? I guess? But if people still have the same framework for thinking about race, but they just know they're not allowed to say their conclusions out loud, does that actually help? I guess then maybe the next generation will grow up not hearing people say those problematic things, so they won't internalize the ideology that goes with it.

Anyway, I agree that we should be aware of the language we use, and the history of it. Chang does a very good job of explaining the history of these racist ideas and why it's problematic when people use certain terminology to discuss race or mixed-race people. But in a practical sense, I sometimes felt like this book was telling me a lot of things we are not allowed to say. And I don't really know what I should say instead? I guess that's not a problem with the book, but with the racism embedded in our society.

---

The history of laws surrounding interracial marriage

When I learned about the civil rights movement in school, I remember learning about laws which made it illegal for a white and black person to marry. And then the famous Supreme Court case, Loving vs Virginia, struck down all those laws. What I did NOT know was that this wasn't just about white/black interracial marriage- there were also laws saying white people couldn't marry Asian people. Wow! I had no idea! And I am a white American married to an Asian guy. Kind of ridiculous that I had never heard about this history at all.

---

White dads who "don't see race"

This book had many examples of white dads being problematic toward their Asian wives and mixed-race kids. For example, there was a white man who was dating a Chinese woman, and wasn't willing to travel to China to meet her family, what on EARTH. There are white men who don't think it's important for their mixed-race Asian kids to learn about their Asian culture, eat the food, celebrate holidays, and so on.

It's common for white people in the US to not really be very aware of race. To assume that since it doesn't affect them, it won't affect their kids either. You look at your own kid, and all you think about is how you love your kid. Of course you don't see them as a simple Asian stereotype, and therefore it never occurs to you that other people will see them that way.

(Also my situation is different because I'm in China; I'm a minority here. This book is written from a US perspective. Obviously very different from what my son is experiencing as he grows up in China.)

I feel that this is something unique that mixed-race kids have to deal with. If you live in the US and have a white parent, that parent hasn't had the experience of people treating them as a racial stereotype, and so they don't know what their child is experiencing. If both parents are monoracial, well that's a different thing than being mixed-race, and so the parents aren't really able to relate to much of what the kids are experiencing.

---

Kids know more about race than their parents expect

Many of the parents interviewed for this book (parents of all races) said they hadn't really talked to their kids about race because they felt like their kids were young enough that it didn't affect them yet. But, the book says, kids do have ideas about race, from a very young age. There are examples of babies who have an Asian mother, and the babies are happy to be held by other Asian women, even total strangers, but cry if someone of a different race holds them. There are examples of toddlers being afraid of black people.

I also haven't talked to my son about race very much. He is in preschool. (My daughter is still an infant. She hasn't even discovered her feet yet. I don't think she knows about race.) I guess I don't really know what I'm supposed to tell him.

My son goes to a public school here in China. All the other kids are (monoracial) Chinese. I wonder if he has thoughts on that. I just assumed that little kids didn't really have any awareness of it, but, uh, why did I assume that? And to me, my son looks Chinese (but I guess I'm not supposed to say that?) but then when I see him next to the other kids, who are Chinese and not mixed-race, well then you can really tell that he's mixed-race white. Sometimes when I pick him up from school, the other kids see me and point out that I'm not Chinese.

(And he always gets Chinese people commenting on how his skin is white, like it's a compliment, which I also find problematic. My FAVORITE one was when we were at a restaurant, and then after we finished eating, I left to go to the bathroom, and then the people at the next table started talking to my husband and son, and they were like "he looks like an international baby"... like... they did not realize he *actually is* an international baby. Apparently they totally missed me being there.)

I guess my son does have thoughts about race. But doesn't have the language to communicate them with me. 

---

Practical suggestions

I'm glad I read this book because it had some practical ideas which I find useful. 

  • I should help my kids find friends who are mixed-race. If they grow up being the only one, they will feel like they're weird and different and no one understands them. I don't know why I didn't think of this before- *I* am in some social media groups for international women married to Chinese men, and that's really helpful for me- why didn't I realize that kind of thing would also be really helpful for my son?
  • Toys and books which depict mixed-race people and interracial marriage. The book talks about how it's really difficult to find stuff like this! It's hard to find a doll which is Asian, let alone mixed-race Asian. After reading "Raising Mixed Race," I got these books for my son: All About Families and All About Diversity [affiliate links]. To show him that there are all different kinds of families and people. These are really good! I guess I should also find a book for him with a main character who is mixed-race white/Asian.

---

It's not just about white + east Asian people

Typically when people think about "mixed race Asian", they think about white + east Asian (ya know, like my kids). But this book makes sure to include a much greater range than that. It includes families from many different Asian countries (including India). And it talks a lot about anti-black racism in the US, and how that is connected to Asian people's experiences in the US, and there's a whole chapter about the unique situation that mixed-race black/Asian people are in.

---

Conclusion

I liked this book, and I recommend it if you have kids who are mixed-race Asian. It helped me realize that I do need to think about how race affects my kids' lives, and how to talk to them about it.

---

Related:

On Marriage as an Immigrant in China 

This "Do Not Intermarry With Them" Stuff Hits Different Now

Friday, January 12, 2024

Blogaround

1. 2024 Arrives With A Sudoku Miracle (January 1) 1-hour-54-minute sudoku solve video. Wow, this ruleset is very complicated. I'm super impressed by Simon solving it.

2. If Trump Is Not an Insurrectionist, What Is He? (January 5) "The unspoken assumption behind the idea that Trump should be allowed on the ballot and that the public should have the chance to choose for or against him yet again is that he will respect the voice of the electorate. But we know this isn’t true. It wasn’t true after the 2016 presidential election — when, after winning the Electoral College, he sought to delegitimize the popular vote victory of his opponent as fraud — and it was put into stark relief after the 2020 presidential election."

3. 'Jane Roe' is anonymous no more. The very public fight against abortion bans in 2023 (December 31) "Now, it's different. 'Women and pregnant people in this country are so angry and so shocked at the treatment that they are receiving at the hands of the state that they have been compelled to tell their stories,' she says."

4. UN experts alarmed by Alabama plan to kill prisoner using untried gas method (January 3) [content note: death penalty] "In a joint statement released on Wednesday in Geneva, the four independent UN monitors call on the US government and Alabama to halt the execution scheduled for 25 January. They accuse the state of rushing ahead with an experimental execution technique that could inflict grave suffering on Smith in violation of the international ban on torture."

5. Epiphany: One Of Us (January 7) "And then God Almighty — God who laid the foundation of the earth, who determined its measurements when the morning stars sang together, God who commands the morning and causes the dawn to know its place, God who bound the chains of the Pleiades and loosed the cords of Orion — wept."

6. WHO Guideline for complementary feeding of infants and young children 6-23 months of age (October 16) New guidelines released by the World Health Organization, about how to feed babies, and WOW there are big changes here! This link has the very long report documents, I will try to see if I can find a shorter summary. But just to give you an idea of how big the changes are: They are now saying that babies can start having cow milk rather than formula at 6 months old (used to be 12 months!). Still saying breastfeeding is best, and recommending that you continue to breastfeed until the baby is 2 years old, and beyond, but wow big changes in the guidelines around formula.

7. Changing Course: Why More Chinese Students Are Eyeing Southeast Asia (January 9) "For instance, in Thailand, Chinese students comprised the majority of international students in 2022, with 21,419 enrollments, a 130% increase from 9,329 in 2012."

8. Who Gets to Be a Person? (January 4) [content note: miscarriage] "In pursuing the case, prosecutors deny Watts the full expression of her grief. They deny her the right to feel pain and shock at her miscarriage, to act like a traumatized human being. Even if the grand jury does not indict her, she has experienced hell."

And an update on that: Ohio woman who miscarried at home won’t be charged with corpse abuse, grand jury decides (January 12)

The main thing here is... a miscarriage at 22 weeks, that's horrible. That's devastating, to lose the baby when you're already 22 weeks into the pregnancy. Watts needs compassion and support; she needs to be allowed to grieve, because that's a terrible thing to go through. But instead she was treated like she had done something bad to her baby.

9. More delays for NASA’s astronaut moonshots, with crew landing off until 2026 (January 10)

10. Do pregnant women have a right to urgent medical care? No, according to a US court (January 10) This is just BONKERS. Doesn't the Texas abortion ban supposedly have an exception for "life of the mother"? So why is Texas now arguing that ERs shouldn't be required to do abortions which are necessary to save pregnant people's lives? So that whole "exception for life of the mother" thing was totally fake, then?

11. In Hottest Year On Record, US Cut Carbon Emissions. Good Start! (January 11)

12. China rolls out new measures to facilitate foreigners’ visit to country (January 11) I saw this in the news, but I don't understand what it actually means in practical terms (like, I'm an immigrant in China, is this gonna benefit me?). We'll see.

Friday, April 3, 2020

Blogaround

1. I Refuse to Participate in Worship that Leads to Devastation (posted March 25) "In Isaiah, worship that endangers others is described as an abomination, a weariness to God, “solemn assemblies with iniquity.” Those who continue to worship in a way that brings harm to those who need protection – they have blood on their hands (Isa 1:15). God hides God’s eyes from them. God ignores their prayers."

2. Wow, this tweet is exactly 100% what I used to believe prayer was:


3. Asia may have been right about coronavirus and face masks, and the rest of the world is coming around (posted April 1) Well HOW ABOUT THAT.

AddThis

ShareThis